week 150/7 answered0/6 days · 0/30 blocks

Project 3 hardening: agent/workflow as a secure product

Interview focus this week: Deep-dive defense of Project 3: MCP tool poisoning defenses, OAuth2 token exchange vs. raw credentials, sandboxed code-agent security, and unified cross-project red teaming.

Stored on this device only. Nothing you type is uploaded: no account, no server database, no analytics, no third-party script. It lives in this browser's localStorage for this browser.

Measured, not remembered

Days complete: 0/6
Blocks ticked: 0/30
Evidence days: 0/6
Evidence fields: 0/81
Gaps opened: 0
Gaps closed: 0
Days started: 0
Deliverables: 12

D1 D10 D11 D12 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 S1 S11 S2 S3 S6 S8 M10 M5 M6 M9

Sunday review · week 15

0/7 answered

01What actually works end-to-end right now without manual intervention?

02What did I measure this week rather than assume?

03What broke during my security labs, and what root cause did it reveal?

04Which security boundary (D1–D12) is now enforced in code and covered by automated tests?

05Which system-design or security interview question can I now answer using my own code as proof?

06What is the single highest-priority deliverable for next week?

07What scope creep or low-priority distraction must I explicitly defer?

This week's days

← week 14 week 16 →